Skip to main content
ATOFISMAComplianceFederal IT

What is ATO Acceleration and Why Does It Matter?

Softek TeamFebruary 18, 20264 min read

If you have ever worked on a federal IT program, you know the Authority to Operate (ATO) process. It is the security authorization gate that every federal system must pass before it can go live. And it is one of the most time-consuming steps in the federal software delivery lifecycle.

The Traditional ATO Process

Under FISMA (Federal Information Security Modernization Act), every federal information system must be assessed against NIST 800-53 security controls before receiving authorization to operate. The process typically involves:

  1. System categorization — Determining the security impact level (Low, Moderate, or High) based on the data the system processes.
  2. Control selection and implementation — Identifying which of the hundreds of NIST controls apply and documenting how each one is implemented.
  3. Security assessment — An independent assessor evaluates whether controls are implemented correctly and operating as intended.
  4. Authorization decision — The authorizing official reviews the risk assessment and grants (or denies) the ATO.

In practice, this process takes 6 to 18 months. Much of that time is spent on documentation — System Security Plans (SSPs), security assessment reports, plans of action and milestones (POA&Ms), and continuous monitoring strategies.

Why It Takes So Long

The bottleneck is not the security requirements themselves. Federal systems should be secure, and the NIST framework provides a solid foundation. The problem is that the process is overwhelmingly manual:

  • Documentation is written by hand. Security teams draft hundreds of pages describing control implementations, often copying and adapting language from previous ATOs.
  • Evidence collection is fragmented. Assessors request screenshots, configuration files, scan results, and policy documents — often stored across multiple systems with no central repository.
  • Reviews are sequential. Each stage waits on the previous one. A single missing document can delay the entire timeline by weeks.
  • Re-authorization is nearly as painful as the initial ATO. Every three years (or when significant changes occur), the process repeats.

What ATO Acceleration Looks Like

ATO acceleration does not mean cutting corners on security. It means automating the manual, error-prone steps while maintaining — and often improving — the rigor of the assessment.

Automated control mapping. AI agents can analyze system architectures and automatically map implemented controls to NIST 800-53 requirements, generating initial SSP documentation that security teams review rather than write from scratch.

Continuous evidence collection. Instead of assembling evidence packages weeks before an assessment, automated tools continuously collect and organize compliance artifacts — scan results, configuration baselines, access logs, and encryption certificates.

Real-time compliance dashboards. Authorizing officials and assessors can see the current compliance posture at any time, rather than relying on point-in-time snapshots that may be outdated by the time they are reviewed.

Automated POA&M tracking. When gaps are identified, they are automatically logged, assigned, and tracked to resolution — with auditable evidence of remediation.

The Results

Federal programs that adopt ATO acceleration practices are seeing material improvements:

  • ATO timelines reduced from 12+ months to 8-12 weeks
  • Documentation effort reduced by 60-70%
  • Fewer findings during assessment (because continuous monitoring catches issues early)
  • Smoother re-authorization cycles (because compliance is maintained continuously, not rebuilt periodically)

Getting Started

The most effective path to ATO acceleration is to build compliance into the development process from the start — not bolt it on at the end. This means selecting development platforms and methodologies that include continuous compliance verification as a core capability, not an afterthought.

For programs that are already mid-cycle, the good news is that automation tools can be integrated incrementally. Start with evidence collection and POA&M tracking, then expand to automated control mapping and continuous monitoring.


Softek helps federal programs achieve faster ATOs through AI-powered compliance automation. See how Axiom accelerates compliance or request a 48-hour POC for your program.

See Axiom on Your Mission

Share your requirements. Get a tailored proof of concept in 48 hours.

8(a) sole source up to $4.5M · HUBZone · GSA MAS